Equity Decimation: The 43-to-18 Concentration Model
The Concentration Thesis
In Q4 2025, the Refine Engine identified a critical inefficiency: 43 equity positions were generating net drag on portfolio alpha. The signal-to-noise ratio had deteriorated below our acceptable threshold of 0.72.
This dispatch documents the complete methodology behind our concentration protocol — a systematic reduction from 43 legacy holdings to 18 high-conviction core positions.
Methodology
The reduction was executed through a three-phase protocol:
- Phase I — Signal Decomposition: Each position was scored against our proprietary alpha-factor model, isolating idiosyncratic returns from beta exposure.
- Phase II — Correlation Pruning: Positions exhibiting >0.85 rolling 60-day correlation with existing core holdings were flagged for removal.
- Phase III — Liquidity Audit: Remaining candidates were stress-tested against a 2-sigma liquidity shock scenario.
Key Performance Metrics
| Metric | Before | After | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Positions | 43 | 18 | -58.1% |
| Portfolio Beta | 1.12 | 0.94 | -16.1% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.34 | 1.89 | +41.0% |
| Weekly Alpha | +4.1 bps | +12.4 bps | +202.4% |
| Tracking Error | 6.2% | 3.8% | -38.7% |
The Noise Elimination Framework
“The essence of investment is not diversification — it is the disciplined elimination of noise.” — Refine Internal Memo, January 2026
Our framework operates on a simple axiom: every position must independently justify its inclusion. There is no room for “portfolio filler” or positions held purely for diversification theater.
The 25 eliminated positions fell into three categories:
- Correlation Redundancies (14 positions): Exposures adequately captured by remaining core holdings
- Alpha Decay (7 positions): Once-productive positions whose alpha signals had mean-reverted to zero
- Liquidity Traps (4 positions): Positions with execution cost exceeding expected alpha contribution
Implementation Notes
The trim was executed over 12 trading sessions using our proprietary VWAP-Adaptive algorithm to minimize market impact:
# Refine Engine v5 — Trim Protocol
def execute_trim(positions: list, target_count: int) -> TrimResult:
scored = alpha_factor_model.score(positions)
pruned = correlation_filter(scored, threshold=0.85)
validated = liquidity_audit(pruned, shock_sigma=2.0)
return validated[:target_count]
Total slippage during execution: 0.8 bps — well within our 2.0 bps tolerance.
Conclusion
The 43-to-18 concentration model represents a paradigm shift in how we construct portfolios. By treating restraint as an alpha source, we achieved a 3x improvement in risk-adjusted returns while dramatically simplifying operational overhead.
This protocol is now embedded in the Refine Engine as Trim_v2 and runs automatically at each quarterly rebalance window.
Dispatch Classification: OPTIMIZED — All parameters verified and production-deployed.